![]() The worst film in the series is the first of three made-for-TV sequels, Anaconda 3: The Offspring, directed by Don E. In anticipation of a new branch for this killer snake series, fans have been revisiting the original five films, but are all of the films worth revisiting? Should fans bother watching any of the sequels, as is so often warned against, or just stick with the original film? Here’s our ranking for the Anaconda series from worst to best. The film is reported to be a re-imagining of the original story rather than a sequel – a smart move on the studio’s part – and will follow the formula of 2018’s giant shark movie, The Meg. But, fans of the killer snake franchise will be excited to hear that a new Anaconda re-imagining has been announced for the coming year, though delays are expected. the latter two are also known for writing Top Gun.Īfter the original Anaconda was released in 1997, it received one full-budget theatrical sequel and then three made-for-TV follow-ups, the final sequel being a crossover with giant crocodile franchise, Lake Placid. The story was originally developed by writers Hans Bauer, Jim Cash, and Jack Epps Jr. ![]() While genre fans are most likely familiar with Luis Llosa’s 1997 film, Anaconda, how do the four other films compare, and how do they rank against one another? The Anaconda films focus on giant man-eating snakes with storylines that alternate between survival-style films and snake-hunting plots following the adventures of various groups as they try to capture or destroy the anacondas. With two theatrical films and three made-for-TV originals, which Anaconda films are worth watching when you’re in the mood for giant killer snakes? Anacondas: The Hunt for the Blood Orchid (2004) ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. Archives
February 2023
Categories |